Latest Cover

Online Office

Contact Us

Issue:ISSN 1000-7083
          CN 51-1193/Q
Director:Sichuan Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by:Sichuan Society of Zoologists; Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation; Sichuan Association of Wildlife Conservation; Sichuan University
Address:College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, No.29, Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610064, China
Fax:+86-28-85410485 &
Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2016 Vol.35 No.2

Studies on Growth and Development Model of Captive Forest Musk Deer
Author of the article:CAI Youghua1, YANG Ying1, FU Wenlong1, ZHU Ping1, FENG Dayong1, LEI Yi2, ZHANG Ming3
Author's Workplace:1. Institute of Breeding and Reproduction of Forest Musk Deer in Sichuan, Dujiangyan, Sichuan Province 611845, China;
2. College of Tourism, Sichuan Agricultural University, Dujiangyan, Sichuan Province 611830, China;
3. College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan Province 625014, China
Key Words:growth curve; forest musk deer; Logistic model; Bertalanffy model; Gompertz model
Abstract:In order to explore the rule of growth and development of body weight and size of caotive forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii), body weight and size (forehead width, head length, ear length, spine length, chest circumference, humerus length, thigh length and leg length) of 320 forest musk deer (males: 160, females: 160) were measured from the birth to the 400th week, and the regression of the measured values and week-age were fitted with Logistic, Bertalanffy and Gompertz model, respectively. The results showed that the three tested models, Logistic, Bertalanffy and Gompertz, could fit the regression of body weight and week-age of forest musk deer. The fitting degree (R2) of Bertalanffy model was better than that of Logistic and Gompertz for males (R2=0.966) and females (R2=0.954). The results of the regression body size and week-age revealed that: Bertalanffy model was better than Logistic and Gompertz models; The fitting degree of limb size and week-age was high, whereas that of head size and week-age was low. In all parameters of body size, the fitting degree of leg length and week-age was the highest in males (R2=0.927) or females (R2=0.933) with Bertalanffy model. The rule of growth and development of body weight and size of forest musk deer could be fitted with Bertalanffy model.
2016,(35): 238-242,248 收稿日期:2015-08-11
作者简介:蔡永华(1962-), 高级工程师
程世国, 邹真慧. 1991. 麝的饲料和饲养[M]. 成都: 四川科技出版社: 4-32.
程世国. 1984. 麝的饲养[J]. 西南民族学院学报: 畜牧兽医版, 10(4): 45-49.
何迟酩, 林进生, 邓家波, 等. 2012. 林麝血液生理生化指标研究[J]. 四川动物, 31(3): 456-459.
姜海瑞, 徐宏发, 王晓黎, 等. 2007. 麝的生物学研究现状分析[J]. 生物学通报, 42(6): 4-6.
竭航, 封孝兰, 陈强, 等. 2014. 圈养林麝生长曲线拟合研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 32(1): 97-102.
李娟, 刘益平, 张明, 等. 2009. 大恒优质肉鸡早期体重发育规律[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 27(3): 345-349.
盛志廉, 吴常信. 1995. 数量遗传学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社: 114-115.
张保良. 1982. 麝的生长发育[J]. 野生动物, 4(4): 24-27.
周瑜, 赵克雷, 田永强, 等. 2013. 几种药物对圈养林麝化脓隐秘杆菌菌膜的影响[J]. 四川动物, 32(3): 330-333.
朱承嗣, 王方荣, 唐清山, 等. 2012. 家养林麝常见病诊断与防治研究[J]. 野生动物, 33(1): 3-4.
Meng XX, Zhao CJ, Hui CY, et al. 2011. Behavioral aspects of captive musk deer during non-mating season: gender differences and monthly pattern[J]. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 24(5): 707-712.
Meng XX, Zhou CQ, Hu JC, et al. 2006. Musk deer farming in China[J]. Animal Science, 82: 1-6.
Migon GS, Beaumont CL, Bihan DE, et al. 1990. Genetic parameters of growth curve parameter in male and female chicken[J]. British Poultry Science, 40(1): 44.
Nunez-Anton V, Zimmerman D, Gregoire TG, et al. 2001. Parametric modeling of growth curve data: an overview[J]. Test, 10(1): 1-73.
von-Rosen D. 1991. The growth curve model: a review[J]. Communications in Statistics-theory and Methods, 20(9): 2791-2822.
Woolson RF, leeper JD. 1980. Growth curve analysis of complete and incomplete logitudinal data[J]. Communications in Statistics-theory and Methods, 9(14): 1491-1513.
Xia S, Zou DF, Yue BS. 2006. Six microsatellite loci in forest musk deer, Moschus berezovskii[J]. Molecular Ecology Note, 6: 113-115.
Yang QS, Meng XX, Xia L, et al. 2003. Conservation status and causes of decline of musk deer (Moschus spp.) in China[J]. Biological Conservation, 109: 333-342.
Zhang SC, Yue BS, Zou FD. 2007. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite DNA marker from forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii)[J]. Zoological Research, 18(1): 24-27.
Zhao SS, Chen X, Fang SG, et al. 2008. Development and characterization of 15 novel microsatellite markers from forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii)[J]. Conservation Genetics, 9: 723-725.
CopyRight©2020 Editorial Office of Sichuan Journal of Zoology